Robert Rogers, (Emeritus), Eugene Boman, (Emeritus)
Section7.2Lagrange’s Form of the Remainder
Joseph-Louis Lagrange provided an alternate form for the remainder in Taylor series in his 1797 work Théorie des functions analytiques. Lagrange’s form of the remainder is as follows.
This is not Lagrange’s proof. He did not use the integral form of the remainder. However, this is similar to Lagrange’s proof in that he also used the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) and Extreme Value Theorem (EVT) much as we did. In Lagrange’s day, these were taken to be obviously true for a continuous function and we have followed Lagrange’s lead by assuming the IVT and the EVT. However, in mathematics we need to keep our assumptions few and simple. The IVT and the EVT do not satisfy this need in the sense that both can be proved from simpler ideas. We will return to this in Chapter 9.
Also, a word of caution about this: Lagrange’s form of the remainder is , where is some number between and . The proof does not indicate what this might be and, in fact, this changes as changes. All we know is that this lies between and . To illustrate this issue and its potential dangers, consider the following problem where we have a chance to compute the value of for the function .
where . It can be seen in part b that . Thus and so by Problem 6.1.7 of Chapter 6, the Lagrange remainder converges to as . This argument would suggest that the Taylor series converges to for . However, we know from part (a) that this is incorrect. What is wrong with the argument?
Even though there are potential dangers in misusing the Lagrange form of the remainder, it is a useful form. For example, armed with the Lagrange form of the remainder, we can prove the following theorem.
First note that the binomial series is, in fact, the Taylor series for the function expanded about . If we let be a fixed number with , then it suffices to show that the Lagrange form of the remainder converges to . With this in mind, notice that
To take care of the case where , we will use yet another form of the remainder for Taylor series. However before we tackle that, we will use the Lagrange form of the remainder to address something mentioned in Chapter 4. Recall that we noticed that the series representation
did not work when , however we noticed that the series obtained by integrating term by term did seem to converge to the antiderivative of . Specifically, we have the Taylor series
Substituting into this provided the convergent series . We made the claim that this, in fact, converges to , but that this was not obvious. The Lagrange form of the remainder gives us the machinery to prove this.