Example 10.3.1.
Consider the IVP,
\begin{align*}
\dfdx{y}{t}=t(4-t), \amp{}\amp{} y(0)=0.
\end{align*}
In Integral Calculus (probably your next math course) you will learn how to find \(y(t)\) explicitly. For now we will be satisfied with sketching an approximate graph of \(y(t)\text{.}\) Setting \(\dfdx{y}{t}=0\) and solving we see that \(t=0\) and \(t=4\) are the POTPs for \(y(t)\text{.}\) Thus on each of the intervals \((-\infty,0)\text{,}\) \((0,4)\text{,}\) and \((4,\infty)\) the graph of \(y(t)\) is either always increasing or always decreasing. We tabulate this information as follows:
Interval | \((-\infty, 0)\) | \((0,4)\) | \((4,\infty)\) |
\(y^\prime (t)\) | \(y^\prime (t)\lt0\) | \(y^\prime (t)\gt0\) | \(y^\prime (t)\lt0\) |
\(y (t)\) | \(\searrow\) | \(\nearrow\) | \(\searrow\) |
Based on this table, we can see that \(y(0)=0\) is a local minimum and \(y(4)\) is a local maximum. Observe that we have no way to determine the value of \(y(4)\text{.}\) All we can say is that the value of \(y(4)\text{,}\) whatever it is must be a local maximum.
We proceed in a similar fashion to determine concavity. The second derivative is
\begin{equation*}
\dfdxn{y}{t}{2}=\dfdx{(t(4-t))}{t}=4-2t.
\end{equation*}
Setting \(\dfdxn{y}{t}{2}=0\) and solving, we see that \(t=2\) is a PITP for \(y(t)\text{.}\) Making a table as before we have
Interval | \((-\infty, 2)\) | \((2,\infty)\) |
\(y^\prime(t) \) | \(y^\prime(t)\gt 0\) | \(y^\prime(t)\lt 0\) |
\(y(t)\) | \(\bigcup\) | \(\bigcap\) |
Based on the table we see that the point \((2,y(2))\) is an inflection point. We want to make a reasonable sketch of the graph of \(y=y(t)\) based on this information. But we need to be careful. There is a lot of information in Table 10.3.2 and Table 10.3.3 and our graph needs to be consistent with all of it. So we first organize all of our conclusions by plotting the transition points (both optimal and inflective) on the \(t\) axis and identifying the intervals where \(y\) is increasing, decreasing, concave up, or concave down.

This information, along with the initial value, \(y(0)=0\) allows us to provide a reasonable graph of \(y(t)\text{.}\)

From the initial condition in the IVP we know that \(y(0)=0\) but we have no information about the vertical coordinate of any other point on the graph. Thus, from the given information the scale of this graph is unknowable. The graph above is reasonable because it is consistent with the data given in the IVP but that is all we can say about it.
This sort of graphical, qualitative analysis is the best we can do with the information we have but, as you see, we can glean a great deal of information about the “shape” of the graph of a function from its derivative alone.